RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘health’

Health Care: When facts don’t matter

22 Jun
I’ve found it difficult to engage in this conversation because most people, from any perspective, have built their argument on a foundation of ignorance. Having worked in medical management, I’ve got a perspective that most medical professionals and patients don’t have. I understand contracts between medical providers and insurance companies. I understand how Medicare and Medicaid work. I understand medical billing.  Having citizenship in two countries I also have a perspective that most people don’t share. Having had family members uninsured, on COBRA, personal insurance, group insurance, and government insurance, I have experience most people don’t.
Here’s some facts if you’d like to transition to a different foundation.
money and a stethescope
It’s a lie that only super wealthy can afford health care.
It’s simply not true. It may be that a doctor’s appointment cost someone $100. Now, we’re willing to pay that $100 to the cable company or the cell phone company. We’re willing to pay $100 to movie studios to watch and buy movies. Doctor’s visits are only for the elite in the same way that cell phones are for the elite: Not at all.
Here in Denver there’s a lot of offices geared specifically to those without a lot of money. The goal is to cut costs and ensure that everyone can get medical treatment. Offices that aren’t geared toward that provide discounts of cash patients, payment plans, and service those who are on Medicaid – tax-funded payment for medical services for the poor.
Cost of care in America
Those with insurance typically see the Explanation of Benefits (EOB) from their insurance company and are shocked at the original bill from the medical provider. A typical EOB reads something like:
Lab work. Billed: $3,000. Insurance discount: $2,994. Insurance paid: $6.
We walk away with the assumption that if we didn’t have insurance, we’d have to pay the list price of $3,000. It’s not true. Here’s a secret about how insurance payments work. Bureaucrats behind Medicare (tax-funded medical payments for the elderly and disabled) have a list of accepted medical procedures and how much the government will pay for those procedures. Each accepted procedure has an associated Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code.  The base Medicare payment rates are so low, they don’t even cover the doctor’s expenses in seeing the patient. Medicaid (tax-funded medical payments for the poor) pay even less. Medical practices enter into contracts with insurance providers, that boil down to something like: “For covered procedures, we’ll pay you Medicare rates plus 15%.”
When the government or insurance payer receives a bill of CPT codes and associated charges, they validate whether the CPT codes are covered, and then pay the contracted rate or the billed rate: whichever is less. Because of this, it doesn’t matter whether they get billed $10 or $10,000 for a blood draw, they’ll only pay the contracted $9.54. The problem is if the billed amount is lower, say, $8, they’ll just pay that. So medical offices mark up the price of everything really high to prevent under-billing.
Cash-paying patients often can pay even less than insurance if they’re up-front. Insurance doesn’t need to be billed, the doctor doesn’t have to wait weeks or months for payment.
Sometimes our medical bills are still high. I recently heard someone angry that they paid over $100 and only saw the doctor for a few minutes. They whined. A lot. But  here’s what that $100 likely paid for:
  • receptionist (scheduling the appointment, placing reminder calls, etc.)
  • nurse and/or medical assistant (the person who checks your vitals before you see the doctor)
  • filing clerk (there’s a lot of laws about how medical records are handled, filing clerks track the files and have to go through training on how to handle records – that training is another expense paid for)
  • doctor (the doc only saw the patient for a few minutes, but spent time reviewing the patient’s history, writing up notes for the medical records, possibly writing referrals and prescriptions, etc.)
  • medical malpractice insurance
  • facility rent
  • medical equipment
  • lab work
  • the debt created by taking on Medicaid and Medicare patients
  • medical disposal costs (there’s special ways – that all cost money – to dispose of various things)
  • billing staff, especially if the patient didn’t say he was cash-only and pay up-front.
Cost of care in other countries
Meanwhile we have experiences or hear stories of cheap health care in other countries. A friend of mine recently went to a hospital in Asia and paid $5.  Reviewing the list above of what has to be paid for, did the hospital really provide all those services for $5? That would be less than 50 cents for each item on the list. $.50 for the receptionist, $.50 for the medical assistant. $.50 for the doctor. $.50 for lab work.
No. The doctors are not living off 50-cents per-patient. The medical bills are just being paid for by another source, and the patient has no idea what the actual cost-of-care was. In many countries, that payer is the government.
  • The government decides what treatment you can have.
  • The government decides when you can have the treatment.
  • The government simply raises taxes to pay for the treatment.

This then makes a legal requirement that someone else pay for your medical expenses. When it’s all paid for through tax revenue, the implication is that tax payers are required to give their hard-earned money to pay for your medical bills. If they don’t? They’ll take away the tax payer property, or take the money forcibly from their paycheck, and in some countries put the citizen in prison for not paying their taxes.

The demand that someone else be required to pay your medical bills or go to prison is immoral.

International Medical Tourism

But what about all those people going to other countries for health care? What about Americans going to Canada for prescription drugs?

I used to live minutes away from the border of Canada. We took trips to Canada to buy certain things cheaper, and my relatives in Canada took trips to the US for certain things that were cheaper. Not only that, but it is normal behavior in Canada to go to the US if you need better or faster health care, and the Canadian healthcare system routinely sends patients to the US. American health care is part of the Canadian health care system, because America does certain things better/faster. It goes both ways.

Americans are traveling to India, Thailand, and other countries for significant medical treatments that are too costly in America. This is simple economics. Trousers in India may be significantly cheaper than in America. The cost of living is lower. They may have less government regulation to comply with. For various reasons, economies are different, and this has no necessary connection to the quality or accessibility of health care. Or pants.

These are the real problems with American health care

I do think America has the best health care – at least better than any other place I’ve had medical care, which is only about 5 countries on 3 continents. Here’s what the basic problems are that could be fixed very quickly:

  1. It’s easy to sue doctors. This means the cost of being a doctor goes up to may for malpractice insurance. This also means that doctors frequently do more tests and treatments than are necessary as an attempt to prevent a lawsuit claiming they didn’t do enough.
  2. It’s easy to collect big bills and then go bankrupt. It is the law that no hospital can turn a patient away. A Physician Assistant I know told me about working in a New York hospital where the same drunk homeless men would come into the E.R. complaining of chest pain every night. They were legally required to give a lot of costly treatment when the guys just wanted a warm place for the night. Others aren’t homeless, but purposely avoid paying for health care to later declare bankruptcy or otherwise avoid payment. This is equivalent of shoplifting, not paying for what you’re taking, and our legislators are the enablers. On the medical side, it’s costly to collect money that hasn’t been paid, and can take years.
  3. Insurance billing is screwed up. The insurance has a set dollar amount they’ll pay the doctor, but the doctor is still required to bill them with a dollar amount. The only reason why the doctor needs to bill a dollar amount is so the payer (government or insurance) can try to under-pay the doctor if the doctor pays less than the agreed payment amount. If this was not the arrangement, doctors and hospitals wouldn’t have to sky-rocket the list price of services, which is what causes people to stress about the cost of care.
  4. We need to take personal responsibility. I ought to be responsible for figuring out how my medical bills are paid. I ought not be responsible for figuring out how yours are paid. The majority of uninsured people already qualify for government insurance, but have never taken responsibility to sign up for it. We have a total aversion to personal responsibility and rejoice when we only have to pay $5 for a doctor’s visit. We’re simply rejoicing that we’re making a sucker of someone else who will be suck with the bill.
  5. Government regulation costs money. And everything medical is regulated. While payments to doctors aren’t increasing, regulations on medical practices increase ever year.

 

 
 

TSA Procedures are not about safety (Part 1)

01 Dec

(I’ve thought about blogging on the Transportation Security Administration’s new procedures, but every time I start another news story hits. At this point, there’s too much for one post, so I figured I’d get started.)

TSA PatdownThe Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has implemented new procedures which include a special type of full-body X-Ray whose radiation is absorbed into your skin and the tissue just under the skin, to produce a naked image of the passenger, and/or the passenger must be patted-down including the passengers sexual organs.

One basic question about this is:

What’s the point of these new procedures?

Napalitano and the TSA says its necessary for safety.

For safety? Airport security was dramatically changed after 9/11. In the last 9 years, how many commercial plans have been successfully used in terrorism? 0. That means whatever’s been going on has had a 100% success rate.

“BUT THERE’S BEEN ATTEMPTS!” Certainly, there was the shoe bomber (Episcopal, right?), and now we take off our shoes to go through airport security. There was also the failed underwear bomber (Presbyterian I think?).  There’s real questions about whether the new procedures would have even detected the underwear bomber’s device.

Further, these devices and pat-down-feel-ups will not detect anything hidden inside of one’s body.

So, as far as any information the public has, these new techniques will not improve on the 100% success rate we’ve had for 9 years without them.

Perhaps the government has other information that hasn’t yet been published on wikileaks. Perhaps we are under imminent threat by terrorists who will use on-the-skin devices to try to commit terror. Perhaps the only way we will be safe from known threats is to hit the terrorists with these new procedures. These new procedures were in place just in time for the busiest travel day of the year. If there’s ever times to use heightened security, it’s when there’s evidence of a threat at a specific time, or the busiest travel days of the year.

What better time to want to blow up a plane than when more people are flying, lines are backed up, everyone is stressed out and in a rush. It’s then that one would most easily slip through undetected.

And it was on the busiest travel days of the year that the TSA played a very sly hand and didn’t enforce the new procedures to deflate the threat of “Opt-Out Day” when many people were going to refuse the scan. When the threat was greatest, they stopped the procedures they said would keep us safe.

And no planes were used to crash into buildings. The standard procedures continued to be 100% effective.

I’ve heard Michael Medved and others write off concerns about this – it’s not that invasive, it’s not that embarrassing. But those aren’t the point. The point isn’t that you or I feel embarrassed, the point is that there’s constitutional issues here about unlawful search. The point is that the government is lying and in the name of security they’re testing to see how much freedom we’re willing to give up when promised safety.

Are you willing to take off your belt and your shoes? Yes.

Are you willing to have your bags x-rayed? Yes.

Are you willing to go through a metal detector? Yes.

Are you willing to be splashed with radiation that will increase your rates of infertility and cancer and/or be subjected to sexual assault by government employees?

Are you willing for your children to be splashed with radiation that will increase their rates of infertility and cancer and/or for your children to be subjected to sexual assault by government employees?

We do not forfeit our rights when we fly on a plane. The purchase of a product or service from a private company does not cause your civil rights to be terminated or suspended.

Clearly the issue is not about security. The TSA was very clever in playing up the concerns and then yanking out the rug from under”Opt-Out Day” so now everyone believes this was just media hype. In the process, the American people have agreed to submit themselves to sexual abuse by the government.

I thought we were supposed to be proud of the call “Give me liberty or give me death,” but instead we together chant “Give me liberty or take it away but tell me it’s for my own good.”

 
 

Bad, bad, US Health Care

30 Nov

Proving the recent studies that say Cuba and other countries have better health care than the US, another international leader, the Saudi King, has traveled internationally for health care.

To Cuba? To the UK? France? Canada? Netherlands?

No. To the United States.

The problems with health care isn’t the treatment – we’ve got the best treatment in the world. Otherwise, perhaps the Saudi King, Canadian officials, and others, would perhaps stay in their own countries or head to Cuba.

The problems have been cost and an entitlement attitude of a large group of citizens.

Cost is high because of a few factors:

  • Cost of compliance with government regulation.
  • Cost of excess treatment to attempt to prevent frivolous lawsuits from being filed.
  • Cost of malpractice insurance and/or legal expenses to fight frivolous lawsuits that have been filed and which benefit trial lawyers (aka Democrat congressmen) more than anyone.

The entitlement attitude is not just among those on government healthcare. If the middle class didn’t feel entitled, we wouldn’t all be in so much debt, having “bought” things we cannot afford. What many Americans expect:

  • Someone else should pay for the health consequences of my behavior.
  • Someone else should pay for the elective treatments I receive.
  • Someone else should take financial care of my family and parents.
  • I deserve to keep the money I make for my work. Doctors that provide treatment and insurance employees that ensure it’s as affordable as possible do not deserve to be paid for their work.

The Obama-Pelosi-Reid health plan does a few things to ensure all the problems get worse:

  • Dramatic increases in government regulation are raising the cost of health care.
  • Purposeful ignorance of the frivolous lawsuits has empowered trial lawyers (Democrat congressmen) to continue to file even more frivolous lawsuits which is raising the cost of health care.
  • Adults up to 26 years old have been told that legally they are not needing to be responsible for their own health care.
  • Everyone has been told that pre-existing conditions, often the result of behavioral choices are not their responsibility and someone else will pay for them.

The costs continue to rise, and the entitlement attitude is being encouraged.

The Obama-Pelosi-Reid health care plan has successfully made the two main aspects of the problem worse.

 
 

Why Breast Cancer (part 2)

12 Oct

Last night I asked the question:

Why does one disease that causes 2% of deaths every year get more attention than all other causes of death?

Breast cancer ribbons are on license plates, political buildings, food products, and apparently even football player uniforms. But it causes 2% of deaths. The leading cause of death kills 20 times as many people. That leading cause of death – that which kills more humans in America is abortion.

All things being equal, we should put our most effort into fighting the leading cause of death (abortion) – 20 times the effort we put into breast cancer awareness. For every breast cancer ribbon, there ought to be 15  heart disease ribbons. For every “I love boobies” bumper stickers, there should be two “I love people who don’t remember me” bumper stickers to promote Alzheimer’s disease which kills nearly twice as many people every year.

But we don’t – we don’t walk twenty miles against abortion for every one mile we walk against breast cancer.

So something is not equal. What are the factors?

Last night I speculated that one factor was the sexualization of culture. It’s about breasts, so we care. I also wrote that we wrongly tend to get our self-image and confidence as a man or woman based on our physical appearances, and for a disease to attack one very clear symbol of being a woman is for the disease to attack our frail self-view.

But I missed what may be the biggest factor.

This morning a friend read my blog post on Facebook and wrote

…Cancer also moves people because it is scary – there may be some ways to reduce your risk, but it is not nearly as preventable as say heart disease which is the #1 killer. We know that diet, exercise, maintenance of an appropriate BMI, etc..will drastically reduce risk of heart disease and stroke but there is no such “simple” formula for breast cancer prevention. It affects women of all ages, races, socioeconomic status and is very likely to significantly affect one of your loved ones (and mine)…

By the numbers, we all have more loved ones affected by heart disease and other killers than breast cancer, but about what makes it different from other diseases, I think she was right. Cancer is different than many diseases because they can be prevented. It’s a sneaky indiscriminate killer. It’s not a gang member that shoots you because you’re in the wrong part of town late at night. Like the flu and Alzheimer’s disease, it’s the killer that breaks into your home at night when you’re sleeping. These non-preventable diseases are scarier (though the argument could be made that it’s the preventable ones that need more awareness so people can prevent them).

Breast cancer can affect any adult woman, regardless of many factors, including health. It’s not a “fatty disease,” which could have been prevented or limited if someone kept themselves more attractive. It’s not a disease that only affects old people.

So why do we care more about deaths caused by breast cancer than anything else, including other non-preventable diseases like Alzheimer’s and the flu? From this perspective, because we value the lives of the people affected more than we value the lives of those killed by other causes. We value the lives of pretty young women more than the lives of fat old men.

The message we communicate by the emphasis on breast cancer is thus:

  • Your life is more valuable if you are a woman, and less valuable if you are a man.
  • Your life is more valuable if you are young, and less valuable if you are old.
  • Your life is more valuable if you are skinny, and less valuable if you are overweight.
  • Your life is more valuable if you are a mother, and less valuable if you are a father.
  • Your life is more valuable if you are an adult, and less valuable if you are aren’t born yet.

Perhaps this is incorrect – leave a comment and let me know so we can figure out this riddle: why does the 2% killer get more attention than everything else.

Again – I’m not downplaying breast cancer, or breast cancer awareness. I’m just trying to figure out the disproportionate attention which seems to communicate that the 2% of people who die of breast cancer are more significant than the other 98% of humans who die every year.

 
 

Our obsession with breasts: breast cancer month

11 Oct

Breast cancer is not the number one killer in America. It is not the number one killer of women.

All cancers, as a category, are the #3 killer, below heart disease, which is #2. But breast cancer kills less people than stroke (cardiovascular disease), chronic lower respiratory diseases, accidents (unintentional injuries), Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, nephritis-nephrotic syndrome-and-nephrosis, and even the flu, according to the CDC.

Despite all of these other causes of death killing more of our loved ones than breast cancer, it’s the disease that gets the most attention. The capital building here in Denver has a big pink ribbon on it, as do cars on the street, and food packaging in every grocery store.

I’m not questioning people’s desire to have a cure for diseases. I’m questioning why one disease trumps so many others which together are 50 times as fatal.

It seems that this is our proud-as-a-peacock display of the objectification of women. We care more about breast cancer, even though it’s only the cause of 2% of deaths in America, because it’s about breasts. Promotional material has gotten more honest, at least, like the “boobies” bumper sticker I took a photo of recently. [Post continues below.]

"Boobies" bumper sticker

It’s understandable that we use our bodies as part of our self worth, and that’s another reason it’s significant. We value our bodies to the level of idolatry, and judge our self-worth as men and women by things that set us apart from each other, particularly in sexual ways. This self-view is something Christians are supposed to fight against as it is contrary to what the Bible teaches. Jesus taught that one’s life is more important than any individual body part (Matthew 5:29-30,6:25), and Paul taught that the marks of true femininity was not in appearance, but in character and good deeds (1 Timothy 2:8-10). (The same is true of men, who are supposed to stand out spiritually and in prayer, lifting holy hands in praying for their authorities without anger or disputing.)

Obviously men like breasts for primal, cultural, and primarily sexual reasons as well. Perhaps that really is what it all comes down to for many people – we support breast cancer research more than anything else because heart disease and Alzheimer’s disease doesn’t make us think of sex.

I hope we have a cure for breast cancer soon. I also hope we have a cure for Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease, diabetes, and other killers. I am troubled that a disease that ranks so low on the list has taken over because the over-sexualization  of our culture.

Please leave comments if there’s reasons I’m unaware of that this 2% killer trumps all others. I’d be interested to learn the answer to this riddle.

Oh – and what is the number one killer in America? Abortion is the number one killer in America. For every 1 woman that dies from breast cancer, 20 babies are aborted – and this only includes legal abortions that are are reported. Twenty.